Friday, March 27, 2015
| previous week | same week | following week | ||||||||||||
| 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 30 | 31 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Like two of Friday’s players, I’ve “come to play.”![]()
What a match – Michael and Eric came out with guns a-blazing.
We enter FJ! with a total of $55,600, just $1,000 shy of the sum amassed by Arthur Chu, Julia Collins, and Ben Ingram in the first day of the last TOC Finals.
|
Jacqueline Hawkins |
Michael Bilow |
Eric Swanson |
| 6,200 | 28,600 | 20,800 |
Speaking of guns, the reason this is so late is my good friend Jacqueline (coincidence) organized a “murder mystery weekend” at an inn in the Catskills. It was perfect: the joint even had a billiards room.
My character, Keith Brunette, ran a floating craps game. Mr. Body and I had a good relationship – he’d bring his friends to the game I’d set up in his LIBRARY, and he’d take them to the brothel afterwards to celebrate their wins or drown their losses.
We had a good arrangement until he lost $10,000 one drunken evening (that’s a lot of money, particularly in 1933, when this game was set) and I sent a few business associates with a LEAD PIPE to convince him to start paying.
Mr. Green was the guilty party. REVOLVER, BALLROOM.
Anyway, our Final Jeopardy! category is:
| TRANSPORTATION |
First-order calculations
Second doubles up
If Eric doubles his score, he’ll have 41,600.
To cover this all-in wager, Michael will need to wager 13,000.
Jacqueline, with less than the difference of their two scores, is out of contention.
| Jacqueline |
Michael |
Eric | |||
| 6,200 | 28,600 | 20,800 | |||
| 13,000 | 20,800 | ||||
| 41,600 | 41,600 | ||||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 13,000 | |||||
An incorrect response with that wager will leave Michael with 15,600.
To stay above his total, Eric can wager up to 5,200.
| Jacqueline |
Michael |
Eric | |||
| 6,200 | 28,600 | 20,800 | |||
| 13,000 | 5,200 | ||||
| 15,600 | 15,600 | ||||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 13,000 | 5,200 | ||||
Third doubles up
A successful doubling will put Jacqueline at 12,400.
Michael could wager at most 16,200.
| Jacqueline |
Michael |
Eric | |||
| 6,200 | 28,600 | 20,800 | |||
| 6,200 | 16,200 | 8,400 | |||
| 12,400 | 12,400 | 12,400 | |||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 13,000 | 16,200 | 5,200 | |||
Here’s where things stand after the first order:
| Jacqueline |
Michael |
Eric | |||
| 6,200 | 28,600 | 20,800 | |||
| FIRST-ORDER | SECOND-ORDER | COVER ZERO | |||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 13,000 | 16,200 | 5,200 | |||
Second-order calculations
Second’s max vs. first
If Eric makes the rational maximum wager of 5,200, Michael will need to wager 2,600 to stay above him.
| Jacqueline |
Michael |
Eric | |||
| 6,200 | 28,600 | 20,800 | |||
| 2,600 | 5,200 | ||||
| 26,000 | 26,000 | ||||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 13,000 | 16,200 | 5,200 | |||
| 2,600 | |||||
In that case, Eric would have to wager 10,400 and respond correctly. That’s worthy of an all-in wager, however.
| Jacqueline |
Michael |
Eric | |||
| 6,200 | 28,600 | 20,800 | |||
| 2,600 | 10,400 | ||||
| 31,200 | 31,200 | ||||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 13,000 | 16,200 | 5,200 | |||
| 2,600 | 10,400* | ||||
Now, after two orders of analysis:
| Jacqueline |
Michael |
Eric | |||
| 6,200 | 28,600 | 20,800 | |||
| FIRST-ORDER | SECOND-ORDER | COVER ZERO | |||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 13,000 | 16,200 | 5,200 | |||
| 2,600 | 10,400* | ||||
Zero wagers
Nothing doing here.
What actually happened
| Jacqueline | Michael | Eric | |||
| 6,200 | 28,600 | 20,800 | |||
| 6,200 | 16,199 | 14,599 | |||
| 0 | 12,401 | 6,201 | |||
| min | max | min | max | ||
| 13,001 | 16,199 | 20,800 | |||
| 2,599 | 5,199 | ||||
There’s nothing wrong with Eric’s wager, per se, assuming he meant to go “big” – he’s covering Michael’s low range. I just hate to see money left on the table.
The last time two players entered Final Jeopardy! with more than $20,000 was Mark Japinga‘s second game, the infamous “Zelda” Final Jeopardy!, on July 12, 2013.
| Mark | Toby | Ken | |||
| 20,800 | 26,400 | 6,600 | |||
| 7,500 | 15,400 | 6,000 | |||
| 28,300 | 11,000 | 600 | |||
| min | max | min | max | ||
| 5,601 | 7,599 | 15,201 | 19,799 | 6,600 | |
| 20,800 | 4,001 | 5,599 | |||
At game’s end, our three players combined for a total score of $18,602. Had all three responded correctly, the total would have been $92,598.
For those of you who do crosswords, this Final clue was a slam dunk.
The Final Jeopardy! clue
| TRANSPORTATION |
| INCORPORATED IN 1948, THIS COMPANY CHOSE ITS NAME FROM THE BOOK OF THE HEBREW PROPHET HOSEA |
[spoiler]What is El Al? (Israel’s national airline)[/spoiler]
| previous week | same week | following week | ||||||||||||
| 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 30 | 31 | 1 | 2 | 3 |

One slight way that Michael’s wager could have been better (at least $600 less): If Eric bets just enough to cover Michael’s zero bet (which is a possibility) Michael unnecessarily loses if they both miss (if you’re the leader in a 2/3-to-3/4 scenario you ought to keep your cover bet small enough not to open that door for your opponent).
Great point, Kelly – now that I’m fine with people going bigger than the bare minimum, there are a few situations I haven’t considered. This is one of them. I’ll point this out next time it happens. Thanks for catching it.
Keith, how many times have two people gone into final with 20,000+?