Friday, March 20, 2015
Let’s see how we finish our week.
Here are our scores heading into Final:
|
Gina Shaddox |
Lesley Cooksey |
Alex Navissi |
| 7,600 | 4,800 | 6,800 |
Tonight’s Final Jeopardy! category is:
| UNWANTED FIRSTS |
Let’s see what each player should do. Remember, we save the dollar changes until the end.
First-order calculations
Second doubles up
If Alex doubles his score, he’ll have 13,600.
To cover this all-in wager, Gina will need to wager 6,000.
| Gina |
Lesley |
Alex | |||
| 7,600 | 4,800 | 6,800 | |||
| 6,000 | 6,800 | ||||
| 13,600 | 13,600 | ||||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 6,000 | |||||
An incorrect response with that wager will leave Gina with 1,600.
To stay above her total, Alex can wager up to 5,200.
Lesley can wager up to 3,200.
| Gina |
Lesley |
Alex | |||
| 7,600 | 4,800 | 6,800 | |||
| 6,000 | 3,200 | 5,200 | |||
| 1,600 | 1,600 | 1,600 | |||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 6,000 | 3,200 | 2,800 | |||
Third doubles up
A successful doubling will put Lesley at 9,600.
To cover this, Alex should wager at least 2,800.
(Gina would need to wager at least 2,000, but this is somewhat questionable.)
| Gina |
Lesley |
Alex | |||
| 7,600 | 4,800 | 6,800 | |||
| 2,000 | 4,800 | 2,800 | |||
| 9,600 | 9,600 | 9,600 | |||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 6,000 | 3,200 | 2,800 | 5,200 | ||
| 2,000 | |||||
If Alex is incorrect with that wager, Lesley can wager up to 800 to stay above his total.
| Gina |
Lesley |
Alex | |||
| 7,600 | 4,800 | 6,800 | |||
| 800 | 2,800 | ||||
| 4,000 | 4,000 | ||||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 6,000 | 800 | 2,800 | 5,200 | ||
| 3,200 | |||||
| 2,000 | |||||
Here’s where things stand after the first order:
| Gina |
Lesley |
Alex | |||
| 7,600 | 4,800 | 6,800 | |||
| FIRST-ORDER | SECOND-ORDER | COVER ZERO | |||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 6,000 | 800 | 2,800 | 5,200 | ||
| 3,200 | |||||
| 2,000 | |||||
Second-order calculations
Second’s max vs. first
If Alex makes the rational maximum wager of 5,200, Gina will need to wager 4,400 to cover him.
| Gina |
Lesley |
Alex | |||
| 7,600 | 4,800 | 6,800 | |||
| 4,400 | 5,200 | ||||
| 12,000 | 12,000 | ||||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 6,000 | 800 | 2,800 | 3,600 | ||
| 2,000 | 3,200 | 5,200 | |||
| 4,400 | |||||
If she’s wrong with that wager, she’ll be left with 3,200.
To stay above her, Alex can wager up to 3,600.
Lesley may risk up to 1,600, but we’ll ignore that.
| Gina |
Lesley |
Alex | |||
| 7,600 | 4,800 | 6,800 | |||
| 4,400 | 1,600 | 3,600 | |||
| 3,200 | 3,200 | 3,200 | |||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 6,000 | 800 | 2,800 | 3,600 | ||
| 2,000 | 3,200 | 5,200 | |||
| 4,400 | |||||
Third’s max vs. second
Against Alex, Lesley can wager at most 800. With a correct response, she’ll have 5,600.
To stay above this, Alex can wager at most 1,200.
| Gina |
Lesley |
Alex | |||
| 7,600 | 4,800 | 6,800 | |||
| 800 | 1,200 | ||||
| 5,600 | 5,600 | ||||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 6,000 | 800 | 2,800 | 3,600 | ||
| 2,000 | 3,200 | 1,200 | |||
| 4,400 | 5,200 | ||||
If he is correct, Alex will have 8,000.
To account for this, Lesley will need to wager at least 3,200. You could make the argument she needs to wager this amount, I suppose, but I’d rather cap at 800.
| Gina |
Lesley |
Alex | |||
| 7,600 | 4,800 | 6,800 | |||
| 3,200 | 1,200 | ||||
| 8,000 | 8,000 | ||||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 6,000 | 800 | 2,800 | 3,600 | ||
| 2,000 | 3,200 | 3,200 | 1,200 | ||
| 4,400 | 5,200 | ||||
Now, after two orders of analysis:
| Gina |
Lesley |
Alex | |||
| 7,600 | 4,800 | 6,800 | |||
| FIRST-ORDER | SECOND-ORDER | COVER ZERO | |||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 6,000 | 800 | 2,800 | 3,600 | ||
| 2,000 | 3,200 | 3,200 | 1,200 | ||
| 4,400 | 5,200 | ||||
Zero wagers
Then we add a dollar to the minimum wagers, and subtract a dollar from the maximum wagers.
| Gina |
Lesley |
Alex | |||
| 7,600 | 4,800 | 6,800 | |||
| FIRST-ORDER | SECOND-ORDER | COVER ZERO | |||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 6,000 | 800 | 2,800 | 3,600 | ||
| 2,000 | 2,800 | 3,200 | 3,200 | 800 | 1,200 |
| 4,400 | 5,200 | ||||
What actually happened
| Gina | Lesley | Alex | |||
| 7,600 | 4,800 | 6,800 | |||
| 2,400 | 4,799 | 6,700 | |||
| 5,200 | 1 | 13,500 | |||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 6,001 | 799 | 2,801 | 3,599 | ||
| 2,001 | 2,799 | 3,200 | 801 | 1,199 | |
Alex’s wager worked out – it’s not as bad as I’d normally say, because Gina showed in Thursday’s game that she wasn’t very well prepared when it came to wagering.
The Final Jeopardy! clue
| UNWANTED FIRSTS |
| JEAN VALLIERE, BURNED IN 1523, IS CONSIDERED THE FIRST MARTYR OF THIS RELIGIOUS GROUP |
[spoiler]Who are the Huegenots?[/spoiler]
| previous week | same week | following week | ||||||||||||
| 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |

In 1523, Jean Calvin was 14 years old. I am sure that he was precocious, but the Huguenots were not founded until the 1530s. If Jean Valliere said he was a Huguenot, then at least he should have been arrested for impersonating Nostradamus. No, Valliere was a Protestant–but at the time the choice was limited to Lutheran, Anabaptist or Hussite.