Monday, March 23, 2015
| previous week | same week | following week | ||||||||||||
| 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 30 | 31 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
After the long reign of Kristin Sausville*, we might be looking at another string of short-lived champs – much like the early Popes of Rome. (Time for a segue!)
As you might have seen, I’ve begun a competition called Papal Pandemonium. Over the next two weeks, your votes will determine the best name ever used by a Pope.
The ballot for the third quarterfinal is open until midnight Eastern time; we’ll have a new round every day.
*Thanks to Kristin for choosing this week’s color scheme, something I offer all 5-time champions!
Another tough game, with a lot of cash lost on Daily Doubles. Alex nailed a $2,000 clue at the end of Daily Jeopardy! to make this a spicy meat-a-ball.
|
Alex Navissi |
Nate Burgan |
Jill Locascio |
| 9,600 | 4,400 | 13,400 |
Tonight’s Final Jeopardy! category is:
| U.S. CITIES |
This is a basic two-thirds situation with the added kink of a player still alive in third place.
First-order calculations
Second doubles up
If Alex doubles his score, he’ll have 19,200.
To cover this all-in wager, Jill will need to wager 5,800.
| Alex |
Nate |
Jill | |||
| 9,600 | 4,400 | 13,400 | |||
| 9,600 | 5,800 | ||||
| 19,200 | 19,200 | ||||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 5,800 | |||||
An incorrect response with that wager will leave Jill with 7,600.
To stay above her total, Alex can wager up to 2,000.
Nate must respond correctly to have a shot, so all-in is the way to go.
| Alex |
Nate |
Jill | |||
| 9,600 | 4,400 | 13,400 | |||
| 2,000 | 3,200 | 5,800 | |||
| 7,600 | 7,600 | 7,600 | |||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 2,000 | 3,200* | 5,800 | |||
Third doubles up
A successful doubling will put Nate at 8,800.
To stay above him, Alex can wager at most 800.
Jill could wager at most 4,600. We’ll ignore this and focus on her mind-game situation with Alex.
| Alex |
Nate |
Jill | |||
| 9,600 | 4,400 | 13,400 | |||
| 800 | 4,400 | 4,600 | |||
| 8,800 | 8,800 | 8,800 | |||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 800 | 3,200* | 5,800 | |||
| 2,000 | |||||
Here’s where things stand after the first order:
| Alex |
Nate |
Jill | |||
| 9,600 | 4,400 | 13,400 | |||
| FIRST-ORDER | SECOND-ORDER | COVER ZERO | |||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 800 | 3,200* | 5,800 | |||
| 2,000 | |||||
Second-order calculations
Quasi-Shoretegic wagers
If Alex chooses to stay above a double-up by Nate, he will have at most 10,400.
Jill can stay above that total by wagering no more than 3,000.
| Alex |
Nate |
Jill | |||
| 9,600 | 4,400 | 13,400 | |||
| 800 | 3,000 | ||||
| 10,400 | 10,400 | ||||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 800 | 3,200* | 5,800 | |||
| 2,000 | 3,000 | ||||
To get above Jill’s total, Alex must wager 6,800. In that case, he might as well wager everything.
| Alex |
Nate |
Jill | |||
| 9,600 | 4,400 | 13,400 | |||
| 6,800 | 3,000 | ||||
| 16,400 | 10,400 | ||||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 800 | 3,200* | 5,800 | |||
| 2,000 | 3,000 | ||||
| 6,800* | |||||
Second’s max vs. first
Were I Jill and thinking about a smaller wager, I’d restrict it to stay above Alex’s maximum wager of 2,000. Alex still needs to go all-in.
| Alex |
Nate |
Jill | |||
| 9,600 | 4,400 | 13,400 | |||
| 2,000 | 1,800 | ||||
| 11,600 | 11,600 | ||||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 800 | 3,200* | 5,800 | |||
| 2,000 | 1,800 | ||||
| 6,800* | 3,000 | ||||
Zero wagers
Nothing doing; that’s all she wrote.
| Alex |
Nate |
Jill | |||
| 9,600 | 4,400 | 13,400 | |||
| FIRST-ORDER | SECOND-ORDER | COVER ZERO | |||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 800 | 3,200* | 5,800 | |||
| 2,000 | 1,800 | ||||
| 6,800* | |||||
What actually happened
| Alex | Nate | Jill | |||
| 9,600 | 4,400 | 13,400 | |||
| 3,801 | 4,200 | 5,801 | |||
| 13,401 | 8,600 | 7,599 | |||
| min | max | min | max | ||
| 9,600 | 4,400 | 5,801 | |||
| 799 | 1,799 | ||||
Alex comes from behind for a second straight day, but leaves $5,799 on the table – and puts himself at risk to losing against a smaller wager from Jill.
(Note that he would have finished in third no matter what Jill wagered had he missed.)
I’m curious to see what Alex might do in the lead – perhaps we’ll find out tomorrow!
The Final Jeopardy! clue
| U.S. CITIES |
| KIPLING WROTE OF THIS CITY, “IF A CAR” CAN “RUN UP & DOWN A SLIT IN THE GROUND…WHY SHALL I SEEK THE REASONS OF THE MIRACLE?” |
[spoiler]What is San Francisco?[/spoiler]
| previous week | same week | following week | ||||||||||||
| 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 30 | 31 | 1 | 2 | 3 |

Keith, Alex Navissi has one thing in common with Arthur Chu, they pronounced (Eldbridge) Gerry’s name ( Jerry)