Wednesday, March 25, 2015
| previous week | same week | following week | ||||||||||||
| 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 30 | 31 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
We’ve got a Harvard Business School professor at the champ’s podium tonight. Will he have a trick or two up his sleeve?
Well, the Daily Double hunting certainly worked out for him – if only he had wagered more, he’d be in a much more comfortable position.
|
Gautam Mukunda |
Jacqueline Hawkins |
Tim Hague |
| 11,600 | 17,000 | 10,000 |
Hey, speaking of Daily Doubles, how about the one in the first round? I did a Fact Primer on the moon missions – if you missed that clue, or want to know more about the Apollo landings, check it out.
I have not done a Fact Primer on tonight’s Final Jeopardy! category:
| ACTRESSES |
Gautam’s going to have a decision to make.
First-order calculations
Second doubles up
If Gautam doubles his score, he’ll have 23,200.
To cover him, Jacqueline will need to wager 6,200.
| Gautam |
Jacqueline |
Tim | |||
| 11,600 | 17,000 | 10,000 | |||
| 11,600 | 6,200 | ||||
| 23,200 | 23,200 | ||||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 6,200 | |||||
An incorrect response with that wager will leave Jacqueline with 10,800.
To stay above her total, Gautam can wager up to 800.
Tim must respond correctly to have a shot, so all-in is the way to go.
| Gautam |
Jacqueline |
Tim | |||
| 11,600 | 17,000 | 10,000 | |||
| 800 | 6,200 | 800 | |||
| 10,800 | 10,800 | 10,800 | |||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 800 | 6,200 | 800* | |||
Third doubles up
A successful doubling will put Tim at 20,000.
To cover this, Gautam should wager at least 8,400. At that rate, he might as well go for broke.
Jacqueline would need to wager at least 3,000. We’ll keep that around for now.
| Gautam |
Jacqueline |
Tim | |||
| 11,600 | 17,000 | 10,000 | |||
| 8,400 | 3,000 | 10,000 | |||
| 20,000 | 20,000 | 20,000 | |||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 800 | 6,200 | 800* | |||
| 8,400* | 3,000 | ||||
Here’s where things stand after the first order:
| Gautam |
Jacqueline |
Tim | |||
| 11,600 | 17,000 | 10,000 | |||
| FIRST-ORDER | SECOND-ORDER | COVER ZERO | |||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 800 | 6,200 | 800* | |||
| 8,400* | 3,000 | ||||
Second-order calculations
Second’s max vs. first
If Gautam makes the rational maximum wager of 800, Jacqueline will need to wager 4,600 to stay above him.
| Gautam |
Jacqueline |
Tim | |||
| 11,600 | 17,000 | 10,000 | |||
| 800 | 4,600 | ||||
| 12,400 | 12,400 | ||||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 800 | 6,200 | 800* | |||
| 8,400* | 3,000 | 4,600 | |||
Normally, I would encourage second to go big here. With this possibility in play, I’m particularly adamant about it.
I’ll throw in Jacqueline’s maximum wager so as to force Tim to get it right. Here are my recommendations:
| Gautam |
Jacqueline |
Tim | |||
| 11,600 | 17,000 | 10,000 | |||
| FIRST-ORDER | SECOND-ORDER | COVER ZERO | |||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 800 | 6,200 | 7,000 | 800* | ||
| 8,400* | 3,000 | 4,600 | |||
What actually happened
| Gautam | Jacqueline | Tim | |||
| 11,600 | 17,000 | 10,000 | |||
| 5,401 | 6,300 | 9,999 | |||
| 17,001 | 23,300 | 19,999 | |||
| min | max | min | max | ||
| 11,600 | 6,201 | 6,999 | 10,000 | ||
| 799 | 3,001 | 4,599 | |||
Gautam took the worst of both worlds here. He doesn’t cover Tim, and he fails to stay above Jacqueline.
If he does win courtesy of a solo get, he also leaves $6,199 in Sony’s pocket.
Jacqueline led in a solid game, and takes the W on the triple green. We’ll see her tomorrow!
P.S. There’s a video treat in the spoiler box below.
The Final Jeopardy! clue
| ACTRESSES |
| FOR PLAYING A LEGAL ASSISTANT IN A 2000 FILM, SHE BECAME THE FIRST ACTRESS TO CRASH THE $20 MILLION SALARY BARRIER |
[spoiler]Who is Julia Roberts?
Now I have this song stuck in my head:
[/spoiler]
| previous week | same week | following week | ||||||||||||
| 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 30 | 31 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
![]()

As soon as I read that FJ, I heard Jack Sparrow play back in my head several times. Only problem is that was (no longer is) the only time I’d heard of the movie so I had no idea on the actress. 😛