Wednesday, July 29, 2015
[php snippet=22]
Hey! Look what I found! I won’t go thirsty tonight!![]()
It’s the dregs of a bottle of Gosling’s Black Rum! I’ll need it after this – seriously, what was everyone thinking here? (Calculations are below the post.)
| Jonathan | Jennifer | Colby | |||
| 18,100 | 10,800 | 15,200 | |||
| 18,100 | 10,786 | 15,000 | |||
| 0 | 14 | 200 | |||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 12,301 | 14,599 | 801 | 1,999 | 6,401 | 8,799 |
| 6,501 | 7,299 | 4,401 | 4,999 | 2,901 | 3,599 |
| 3,501 | 5,799 | ||||
I joked about this last week, but due to popular demand, I’ve opened a fundraiser for my liquor cabinet.
Now if you’ll excuse me, I’m off to the bar.
The Final Jeopardy! clue
| WOMEN AUTHORS |
| THIS WOMAN WHO PASSED AWAY IN 2015 WROTE WHAT IS BILLED AS AUSTRALIA’S “GONE WITH THE WIND” |
[spoiler]Who was Colleen McCullough? (the novel in question was The Thorn Birds)[/spoiler]
[php snippet=22]
First-order calculations
Second doubles up
If Colby doubles his score, he’ll have 30,400.
To cover this all-in wager, Jonathan will need to wager 12,300.
| Jonathan |
Jennifer |
Colby | |||
| 18,100 | 10,800 | 15,200 | |||
| 12,300 | 15,200 | ||||
| 30,400 | 30,400 | ||||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 12,300 | |||||
An incorrect response with that wager will leave Jonathan with 5,800.
To stay above his total, Colby can wager up to 9,400.
Jennifer can wager up to 5,000.
| Jonathan |
Jennifer |
Colby | |||
| 18,100 | 10,800 | 15,200 | |||
| 12,300 | 5,000 | 9,400 | |||
| 5,800 | 5,800 | 5,800 | |||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 12,300 | 5,000 | 9,400 | |||
Third doubles up
A successful doubling will put Jennifer at 21,600.
To cover this, Colby should wager at least 6,400.
(Jonathan would need to wager at least 3,500, but this is somewhat questionable.)
| Jonathan |
Jennifer |
Colby | |||
| 18,100 | 10,800 | 15,200 | |||
| 3,500 | 10,800 | 6,400 | |||
| 21,600 | 21,600 | 21,600 | |||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 12,300 | 5,000 | 6,400 | 9,400 | ||
| 3,500 | |||||
If Colby is incorrect with that wager, Jennifer can wager up to 2,000 to stay above his total.
| Jonathan |
Jennifer |
Colby | |||
| 18,100 | 10,800 | 15,200 | |||
| 2,000 | 6,400 | ||||
| 8,800 | 8,800 | ||||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 12,300 | 2,000 | 6,400 | 9,400 | ||
| 5,000 | |||||
| 3,500 | |||||
We’ll throw in the 3,800 minimum for Jennifer to cover Jonathan’s small range.
| Jonathan |
Jennifer |
Colby | |||
| 18,100 | 10,800 | 15,200 | |||
| FIRST-ORDER | SECOND-ORDER | COVER ZERO | |||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 12,300 | 2,000 | 6,400 | 9,400 | ||
| 3,800 | 5,000 | ||||
| 3,500 | |||||
Second-order calculations
Second’s max vs. first
If Colby makes the rational maximum wager of 9,400, Jonathan will need to wager 6,500 to cover him.
| Jonathan |
Jennifer |
Colby | |||
| 18,100 | 10,800 | 15,200 | |||
| 6,500 | 9,400 | ||||
| 24,600 | 24,600 | ||||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 12,300 | 2,000 | 6,400 | 9,400 | ||
| 6,500 | 3,800 | 5,000 | |||
| 3,500 | |||||
If he’s wrong with that wager, he’ll be left with 11,600.
To stay above him, Colby can wager up to 3,600.
Jennifer might consider risking at least 800.
| Jonathan |
Jennifer |
Colby | |||
| 18,100 | 10,800 | 15,200 | |||
| 6,500 | 800 | 3,600 | |||
| 11,600 | 11,600 | 11,600 | |||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 12,300 | 800 | 2,000 | 6,400 | 9,400 | |
| 6,500 | 3,800 | 5,000 | 3,600 | ||
| 3,500 | |||||
That should be enough of a range for our players.
Zero wagers
Score differences:
Jonathan and Colby: 2,900
Jonathan and Jennifer: 7,300
Colby and Jennifer: 4,400
| Jonathan |
Jennifer |
Colby | |||
| 18,100 | 10,800 | 15,200 | |||
| FIRST-ORDER | SECOND-ORDER | COVER ZERO | |||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 12,300 | 14,600 | 800 | 2,000 | 6,400 | 8,800 |
| 6,500 | 7,300 | 4,400 | 5,000 | 2,900 | 3,600 |
| 3,500 | 5,800 | ||||

Why is Jennifer’s wager red? You’re recommended wagers don’t have her covering a zero from the leader.
That was my thought as well. Jennifer’s wager only looks horrible in the context of Jonathan’s screw up. Really though, if she’s wagering over 5,000, she should be going all in. And there are a few very good reasons to wager over 5,000.
I feel the probability of Jonathan laying a goose egg is very small. I’ll do some research.
I don’t know what’s funnier: the fact that Jennifer could’ve won with $14, the fact that Colby won with $200, or the fact that Keith actually has booze for these wagers.
Jonathan’s wager was inexplicable. How anyone can go on the show and not learn the basics of this aspect of the game is beyond me.
Anytime a 3rd place player needs 1st and 2nd to miss to have any reasonable* chance to win, they should bet the minimum of their range since they are a 2:1 dog to get FJ correct assuming 1st and 2nd miss (wrong-wrong-wrong happens ~twice as often as wrong-wrong-right).
*Assumes that 1st and 2nd at least bet to cover 3rd. which has Ken notes, will happen at a very high frequency.
I looked through all two years of TFW just to see how bad these past two days were. Yesterday was only the second time everyone received either Red or Grey wagers, and it was the first time that there were three players involved. Turns out, it would only take a single day for that to happen again.
Even worse, this season had shaped up better; these were only the second and third days this season which had three pink or worse wagers, and the forth and fifth where everyone had that. This is in contrast to the seven or nine respectively that happened last season.