Monday, July 6, 2015
[php snippet=19]
To me, nothing says America like bad math – something we’ve seen all too often lately!![]()
We had a good game tonight – will we keep it up in Final?
|
Hilary Carney |
Shu-Ping Shen |
Jess Lindoerfer |
| 17,800 | 11,400 | 15,400 |
Here’s our category:
| THE OSCARS |
First-order calculations
Second doubles up
If Jess doubles her score, she’ll have 30,800.
To cover this all-in wager, Hilary will need to wager 13,000.
| Hilary |
Shu-Ping |
Jess | |||
| 17,800 | 11,400 | 15,400 | |||
| 13,000 | 15,400 | ||||
| 30,800 | 30,800 | ||||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 13,000 | |||||
An incorrect response with that wager will leave Hilary with 4,800.
To stay above her total, Jess can wager up to 10,600.
Shu-Ping can wager up to 6,600.
| Hilary |
Shu-Ping |
Jess | |||
| 17,800 | 11,400 | 15,400 | |||
| 13,000 | 6,600 | 10,600 | |||
| 4,800 | 4,800 | 4,800 | |||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 13,000 | 6,600 | 10,600 | |||
Third doubles up
A successful doubling will put Shu-Ping at 22,800.
To cover this, Jess should wager at least 7,400.
Hilary would need to wager at least 5,000, but leaves herself prone to getting overtaken by Jess.
| Hilary |
Shu-Ping |
Jess | |||
| 17,800 | 11,400 | 15,400 | |||
| 5,000 | 11,400 | 7,400 | |||
| 22,800 | 22,800 | 22,800 | |||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 13,000 | 6,600 | 10,600 | |||
| 7,400 | |||||
| 5,000 | |||||
If Jess is incorrect with that wager, Shu-Ping can wager up to 3,400 to stay above her total. He’d also want to wager 1,400 to cover an incorrect Hilary response.
| Hilary |
Shu-Ping |
Jess | |||
| 17,800 | 11,400 | 15,400 | |||
| 3,400 | 7,400 | ||||
| 8,000 | 8,000 | ||||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 13,000 | 6,600 | 10,600 | |||
| 1,400 | 3,400 | 7,400 | |||
| 5,000 | |||||
Here’s where things stand after the first order:
| Hilary |
Shu-Ping |
Jess | |||
| 17,800 | 11,400 | 15,400 | |||
| FIRST-ORDER | SECOND-ORDER | COVER ZERO | |||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 13,000 | 6,600 | 10,600 | |||
| 1,400 | 3,400 | 7,400 | |||
| 5,000 | |||||
Second-order calculations
Second’s max vs. first
If Jess makes the rational maximum wager of 10,600, Hilary will need to wager 8,200 to cover her.
| Hilary |
Shu-Ping |
Jess | |||
| 17,800 | 11,400 | 15,400 | |||
| 8,200 | 10,600 | ||||
| 26,000 | 26,000 | ||||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 13,000 | 6,600 | 10,600 | |||
| 5,000 | 1,400 | 3,400 | 7,400 | ||
| 8,200 | |||||
If she’s wrong with that wager, she’ll be left with 9,600.
To stay above her, Jess can wager up to 5,800.
Shu-Ping may risk up to 1,800.
| Hilary |
Shu-Ping |
Jess | |||
| 17,800 | 11,400 | 15,400 | |||
| 8,200 | 1,800 | 5,800 | |||
| 9,600 | 9,600 | 9,600 | |||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 13,000 | 6,600 | 7,400 | 10,600 | ||
| 5,000 | 1,400 | 1,800 | 5,800 | ||
| 8,200 | 3,400 | ||||
Third’s max vs. second
Against Jess, Shu-Ping can wager at most 3,400. With a correct response, he’ll have 14,800.
To stay above this, Jess can wager at most 600.
| Hilary |
Shu-Ping |
Jess | |||
| 17,800 | 11,400 | 15,400 | |||
| 3,400 | 600 | ||||
| 14,800 | 14,800 | ||||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 13,000 | 6,600 | 7,400 | 10,600 | ||
| 5,000 | 1,400 | 1,800 | 5,800 | ||
| 8,200 | 3,400 | 600 | |||
If she is correct, Jess will have 16,000.
To account for this, Shu-Ping will need to wager at least 4,600.
| Hilary |
Shu-Ping |
Jess | |||
| 17,800 | 11,400 | 15,400 | |||
| 4,600 | 600 | ||||
| 16,000 | 16,000 | ||||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 13,000 | 4,600 | 6,600 | 7,400 | 10,600 | |
| 5,000 | 1,400 | 1,800 | 5,800 | ||
| 8,200 | 3,400 | 600 | |||
Now, after two orders of analysis:
| Hilary |
Shu-Ping |
Jess | |||
| 17,800 | 11,400 | 15,400 | |||
| FIRST-ORDER | SECOND-ORDER | COVER ZERO | |||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
Zero wagers
Score differences:
Hilary and Jess: 2,400
Hilary and Shu-Ping: 6,400
Jess and Shu-Ping: 4,000
| Hilary |
Shu-Ping |
Jess | |||
| 17,800 | 11,400 | 15,400 | |||
| FIRST-ORDER | SECOND-ORDER | COVER ZERO | |||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 13,000 | 6,400 | 6,600 | 7,400 | 8,000 | |
| 5,000 | 6,400 | 1,400 | 1,800 | 4,800 | 5,800 |
| 8,200 | 3,400 | 2,400 | 4,000 | ||
Then we add a dollar to the minimum wagers, and subtract a dollar from the maximum wagers.
What actually happened
| Hilary | Shu-Ping | Jess | |||
| 17,800 | 11,400 | 15,400 | |||
| 12,400 | 1,601 | 2,401 | |||
| 5,400 | 13,001 | 17,801 | |||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 13,001 | 6,401 | 6,599 | 7,401 | 7,999 | |
| 5,001 | 6,399 | 1,401 | 1,799 | 4,801 | 5,799 |
| 8,201 | 3,399 | 2,401 | 3,999 | ||
Looks like Shu-Ping was thinking ahead, and predicting that 2,401 wager out of Jess. I’m guessing Hilary made a mistake with the math. Check! Double-check! Triple-check!
At first I gave Jess a pink, but I upgraded her to an orange – although the 4,801 wager is probably better in most circumstances, I just don’t see Hilary wagering less than 5,001, particularly against two knowledgeable opponents. Plus that larger range would make Jess fall below Shu-Ping’s pre-Final total.
Maybe the 599 wager makes more sense for Jess if she doesn’t want to cover Shu-Ping. Tough call.
Another new champ!
The Final Jeopardy! clue
| THE OSCARS |
| “GLADIATOR” IS CLOSE, BUT THIS FILM HAS THE EARLIEST HISTORICAL SETTING OF ANY BEST PICTURE OSCAR WINNER |
[spoiler]What is Ben-Hur?[/spoiler]
[php snippet=19]
