Final Jeopardy! wagering analysis:
Tuesday, July 5, 2016
[php snippet=72]
When Alex Trebek offers his take on wagering, you’re generally best off assuming the opposite is correct.
Liz did not make a “gutsy” wager last night; she did what she had to do. (She didn’t wager almost everything, either.)
Notes for tonight’s video:
Liz is in second again tonight, but in a much better position.
|
Liz Hedreen (1x) |
TJ Bateman |
Julie Vazquez-Souza |
| 16,200 | 18,800 | 6,600 |
Our Final Jeopardy! category:
| FAMOUS AMERICANS |
We’ve got a bit of Shoretegy to deal with here. Also, once again, Archer comes to the rescue on a high-value clue:
First-order calculations
Julie, in third, is in a “Strong” position against TJ, but Liz can wager to keep her locked out.
| Liz |
TJ |
Julie | |||
| 16,200 | 18,800 | 6,600 | |||
| FIRST-ORDER | SECOND-ORDER | COVER ZERO | |||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 3,000 | 13,600 | 1,400 | |||
| 11,000 | 5,600 | ||||
Second-order calculations
TJ and Liz can go back and forth with the mind games, should either so desire.
| Liz |
TJ |
Julie | |||
| 16,200 | 18,800 | 6,600 | |||
| FIRST-ORDER | SECOND-ORDER | COVER ZERO | |||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 2,200 | 3,000 | 13,600 | 1,400 | ||
| 8,200 | 11,000 | 400 | 5,600 | ||
Zero wagers
Score differences:
TJ and Liz: 2,600
TJ and Julie: 12,200
Liz and Julie: 9,600
| Liz |
TJ |
Julie | |||
| 16,200 | 18,800 | 6,600 | |||
| FIRST-ORDER | SECOND-ORDER | COVER ZERO | |||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 2,600 | 3,000 | 13,600 | 1,400 | ||
| 8,200 | 9,600 | 400 | 5,200 | ||
This was a good Final Jeopardy! clue, and watching the camera pan across the players gave a preview of what was to come…
What actually happened
| Liz | TJ | Julie | |||
| 16,200 | 18,800 | 6,600 | |||
| 16,200 | 13,601 | 6,600 | |||
| 0 | 5,199 | 0 | |||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 2,601 | 2,999 | 13,601 | 1,399 | ||
| 8,201 | 9,599 | 401 | 5,199 | ||
Another “gutsy” wager from Liz? No, just a costly one. TJ lives to fight another day – and I look forward to seeing what he does with his Daily Double(s) tomorrow, should he find any. (I was surprised he didn’t go hunting more toward the end of the second round.)
The Final Jeopardy! clue
| FAMOUS AMERICANS |
| IN 1902, 25 YEARS AFTER HIS DEATH, A N.Y. TIMES ARTICLE ABOUT A FAMILY REUNION LISTED HIS DIRECT DESCENDANTS AT MORE THAN 1,000 |


I got the Jade one, although I have seen Maori art pieces carved of jade. However on the “incumbent” clue, I thought of the correct response and imediately ruled it out, because the wording made it seem like they gave a definition, not a simple description (because yes, writers, I guess technically incumbents are often favored to win the race).