Monday, June 22, 2015
[php snippet=17]
The last three players to sweep an entire week have lost on a Monday. Will five-timer Brennan Bushee suffer the same fate?![]()
For the first time, he’s trailing heading into Final – but he has a perfect FJ! record to fall back on.
|
Brennan Bushee |
Kay Yung |
Sacha Samotin |
| 11,800 | 16,200 | 9,800 |
Tonight’s Final Jeopardy! category is:
| THE FUTURE OF TELEVISION |
This one could get hairy. (Whoops – how’d that glass of scotch get into my hand?)
First-order calculations
Second doubles up
If Brennan doubles his score, he’ll have 23,600.
To cover this all-in wager, Kay will need to wager 7,400.
| Brennan |
Kay |
Sacha | |||
| 11,800 | 16,200 | 9,800 | |||
| 11,800 | 7,400 | ||||
| 23,600 | 23,600 | ||||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 7,400 | |||||
An incorrect response with that wager will leave Kay with 8,800.
To stay above her total, Brennan can wager up to 3,000.
Sacha can wager up to 1,000.
| Brennan |
Kay |
Sacha | |||
| 11,800 | 16,200 | 9,800 | |||
| 3,000 | 7,400 | 1,000 | |||
| 8,800 | 8,800 | 8,800 | |||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 3,000 | 7,400 | 1,000 | |||
Third doubles up
A successful doubling will put Sacha at 19,600.
To cover this, Brennan should wager at least 7,800. In this case, though, he will lose on an incorrect response, so he might as well wager everything.
| Brennan |
Kay |
Sacha | |||
| 11,800 | 16,200 | 9,800 | |||
| 7,800 | 3,400 | 9,800 | |||
| 19,600 | 19,600 | 19,600 | |||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 7,800* | 7,400 | 1,000 | |||
| 3,000 | |||||
| 3,400 | |||||
Here’s where things stand after the first order:
| Brennan |
Kay |
Sacha | |||
| 11,800 | 16,200 | 9,800 | |||
| FIRST-ORDER | SECOND-ORDER | COVER ZERO | |||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 7,800* | 7,400 | 1,000 | |||
| 3,000 | |||||
| 3,400 | |||||
Second-order calculations
Second’s max vs. first
If Brennan makes the rational maximum wager of 3,000, Kay will need to wager 1,400 to stay above him.
| Brennan |
Kay |
Sacha | |||
| 11,800 | 16,200 | 9,800 | |||
| 3,000 | 1,400 | ||||
| 14,800 | 14,800 | ||||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 7,800* | 7,400 | 1,000 | |||
| 3,000 | 3,400 | ||||
| 1,400 | |||||
In that case, Brennan would have to wager 5,800 and respond correctly. Another vote for the all-in wager.
Sacha might consider risking at least 7,800 – in other words, everything.
| Brennan |
Kay |
Sacha | |||
| 11,800 | 16,200 | 9,800 | |||
| 5,800 | 1,400 | 7,800 | |||
| 17,600 | 17,600 | 17,600 | |||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 7,800* | 7,400 | 1,000 | |||
| 3,000 | 3,400 | 7,800* | |||
| 1,400 | |||||
Third’s max vs. first
Brennan should cap his lowball wager at 1,000 in case Sacha has a similar idea.
| Brennan |
Kay |
Sacha | |||
| 11,800 | 16,200 | 9,800 | |||
| 1,000 | 5,400 | 1,000 | |||
| 10,800 | 10,800 | 10,800 | |||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 7,800* | 7,400 | 1,000 | |||
| 1,000 | 3,400 | 7,800* | |||
| 3,000 | 1,400 | ||||
Now, after two orders of analysis:
| Brennan |
Kay |
Sacha | |||
| 11,800 | 16,200 | 9,800 | |||
| FIRST-ORDER | SECOND-ORDER | COVER ZERO | |||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 7,800* | 7,400 | 1,000 | |||
| 1,000 | 3,400 | 7,800* | |||
| 3,000 | 1,400 | ||||
Zero wagers
Score differences:
Kay and Brennan: 4,400
Kay and Sacha: 6,400
Brennan and Sacha: 2,000
| Brennan |
Kay |
Sacha | |||
| 11,800 | 16,200 | 9,800 | |||
| FIRST-ORDER | SECOND-ORDER | COVER ZERO | |||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 8,800* | 7,400 | 8,800 | 1,000 | ||
| 1,000 | 3,400 | 4,400 | 7,800 | ||
| 1,400 | |||||
Then we add a dollar to the minimum wagers, and subtract a dollar from the maximum wagers.
What actually happened
| Brennan | Kay | Sacha | |||
| 11,800 | 16,200 | 9,800 | |||
| 5,000 | 0 | 9,800 | |||
| 16,800 | 16,200 | 19,600 | |||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 11,800 | 7,401 | 8,799 | 999 | ||
| 999 | 3,401 | 4,399 | 9,800 | ||
| 1,399 | |||||
Maybe Brennan is a believer in paying it forward – after all, he did get one hell of a gift on Friday’s episode.
I do want to point out my Corollary to Rule #2 of my original wagering tutorial: If you must get it right to be in contention, wager everything.
Don’t even think about it!
In any event, Brennan had a great run, winning $126,404 in his five victories. He’ll be back for the TOC – his six-Final streak still alive.
The Final Jeopardy! clue
| THE FUTURE OF TELEVISION |
| THIS LIVE-ACTION TV SHOW ABOUT A FAMILY DEBUTED IN 1965 AND WAS SET IN 1997 |
[spoiler]What is “Lost in Space”?[/spoiler]
[php snippet=17]

I’d like to mention that if Brennan wagers the rational 999, he will have 12799. To stay above this, Kay will have to wager no more than 3400. But she has to wager at least 3400 against Sacha. Thus, it is a wager to tie scenario.
On the other hand, practically everything seems to me to be a wager to tie scenario, so we probably shouldn’t go in so deeply.
Besides, I tried figuring out and deriving the equation, and ended up (twice!, starting with two different equations) with 3C – 4A = 5B, which obviously makes no sense.