Tuesday, June 2, 2015
[php snippet=14]
On June 2, 2004, Ken Jennings won for the first time.
On June 2, 2014, Julia Collins lost for the first time.
Will 5-time champ Dan Feitel do something notable today?![]()
Well, he’s got the lead – but things are a bit more knotty than previous games.
|
Dan Feitel |
Jacob Johnson |
Tara Whittle |
| 16,600 | 14,100 | 8,600 |
Tonight’s Final Jeopardy! category is:
| INFAMOUS |
Hmmm. Bonnie & Clyde, perhaps?
First-order calculations
Second doubles up
If Jacob doubles his score, he’ll have 28,200.
To cover this all-in wager, Dan will need to wager 11,600.
| Dan |
Jacob |
Tara | |||
| 16,600 | 14,100 | 8,600 | |||
| 11,600 | 14,100 | ||||
| 28,200 | 28,200 | ||||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 11,600 | |||||
An incorrect response with that wager will leave Dan with 5,000.
To stay above his total, Jacob can wager up to 9,100.
Tara can wager up to 3,600.
| Dan |
Jacob |
Tara | |||
| 16,600 | 14,100 | 8,600 | |||
| 11,600 | 9,100 | 3,600 | |||
| 5,000 | 5,000 | 5,000 | |||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 11,600 | 9,100 | 3,600 | |||
Third doubles up
A successful doubling will put Tara at 17,200.
To cover this, Jacob should wager at least 3,100.
(Dan would need to wager at least 600, but this is somewhat questionable.)
| Dan |
Jacob |
Tara | |||
| 16,600 | 14,100 | 8,600 | |||
| 600 | 3,100 | 8,600 | |||
| 17,200 | 17,200 | 17,200 | |||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 11,600 | 3,100 | 9,100 | 3,600 | ||
| 600 | |||||
Tara would need to wager at least 2,400 to get above Jacob if he’s wrong.
| Dan |
Jacob |
Tara | |||
| 16,600 | 14,100 | 8,600 | |||
| 3,100 | 2,400 | ||||
| 11,000 | 11,000 | ||||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 11,600 | 3,100 | 9,100 | 2,400 | 3,600 | |
| 600 | |||||
Here’s where things stand after the first order:
| Dan |
Jacob |
Tara | |||
| 16,600 | 14,100 | 8,600 | |||
| FIRST-ORDER | SECOND-ORDER | COVER ZERO | |||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 11,600 | 3,100 | 9,100 | 2,400 | 3,600 | |
| 600 | |||||
Second-order calculations
Second’s max vs. first
If Jacob makes the rational maximum wager of 9,100, Dan will need to wager 6,600 to cover him.
| Dan |
Jacob |
Tara | |||
| 16,600 | 14,100 | 8,600 | |||
| 6,600 | 9,100 | ||||
| 23,200 | 23,200 | ||||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 11,600 | 3,100 | 9,100 | 2,400 | 3,600 | |
| 6,600 | |||||
| 600 | |||||
If he’s wrong with that wager, he’ll be left with 10,000.
To stay above him, Jacob can wager up to 4,100.
Tara might consider risking at least 1,400.
| Dan |
Jacob |
Tara | |||
| 16,600 | 14,100 | 8,600 | |||
| 6,600 | 4,100 | 1,400 | |||
| 10,000 | 10,000 | 10,000 | |||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 11,600 | 3,100 | 4,100 | 2,400 | 3,600 | |
| 6,600 | 9,100 | ||||
| 600 | |||||
Third’s max vs. first
I don’t see any reason for Jacob or Dan to make this play – the potential for Tara to go big is too strong.
| Dan |
Jacob |
Tara | |||
| 16,600 | 14,100 | 8,600 | |||
| 4,400 | 1,900 | 3,600 | |||
| 12,200 | 12,200 | 12,200 | |||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 11,600 | 3,100 | 4,100 | 2,400 | 3,600 | |
| 6,600 | 9,100 | ||||
| 600 | |||||
Now, after two orders of analysis:
| Dan |
Jacob |
Tara | |||
| 16,600 | 14,100 | 8,600 | |||
| FIRST-ORDER | SECOND-ORDER | COVER ZERO | |||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 11,600 | 3,100 | 4,100 | 2,400 | 3,600 | |
| 6,600 | 9,100 | ||||
| 600 | |||||
Zero wagers
Score differences:
Dan and Jacob: 2,500
Dan and Tara: 8,000
Jacob and Tara: 5,500
| Dan |
Jacob |
Tara | |||
| 16,600 | 14,100 | 8,600 | |||
| FIRST-ORDER | SECOND-ORDER | COVER ZERO | |||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 11,600 | 16,000 | 3,100 | 4,100 | 2,400 | 3,600 |
| 6,600 | 8,000 | 5,000 | 5,500 | ||
| 600 | 9,100 | ||||
Then we add a dollar to the minimum wagers, and subtract a dollar from the maximum wagers.
What actually happened
| Dan | Jacob | Tara | |||
| 16,600 | 14,100 | 8,600 | |||
| 16,599 | 3,101 | 6,300 | |||
| 1 | 17,201 | 2,300 | |||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 11,601 | 15,999 | 3,101 | 4,099 | 2,401 | 3,599 |
| 6,601 | 7,999 | 5,001 | 5,499 | ||
Congrats to Dan on a stellar run – while I clearly didn’t always agree with the “everything but a dollar” strategy, it worked well for him. He leaves with $127,998 and a berth in the next Tournament of Champions.
And congrats to Jacob for unseating a very strong champ – we’ll see how he does from the leftmost podium on Wednesday.
And to Tara, for hanging in against two buzzer demons.
I’ll have more on Dan’s strategy soon in a new By the Numbers installment. But check out this interview he did about his run:
The Final Jeopardy! clue
| INFAMOUS |
| BORN IN ILLINOIS OF HUGUENOT ANCESTRY, HE WAS EXECUTED IN JUNE 1882, A YEAR AFTER HIS HEINOUS ACT |
[spoiler]Who is Charles Guiteau? (assassin of President James Garfield)[/spoiler]
[php snippet=14]

Jacob seems like a pretty smart guy, and his 3,101-5,499 is fairly compelling. Given Dan’s history, going big is a bad idea for Jacob.
If I’m Dan, I can crush that range with my own wager of 3,000-5,600. The 3,000-4,399 portion of that also does well against Tara’s admittedly less compelling cap at 3,600. That 3,000 amount is definitely what I’d picked for him.
This seemed like a particularly ripe scenario for mind games.
Please correct spelling of Frances Folsom (NOT Francis!) I’ve been fighting the battle my entire life to educate people that the female name is spelled FrancEs…FrancIs is a male name. We have not had a male first lady yet.