Final Jeopardy! wagering analysis:
Wednesday, March 9, 2016
[php snippet=53]
You’ll notice that Alex wasn’t praising any wagers during his intro tonight.
Bill showed that it’s entirely possible to play the game aggressively, fail, and be in contention heading into Final. I hope that changes the way some people play in the future.
|
Annie Moriondo (1x) |
Katrina Mundinger |
Bill Patschak |
| 10,200 | 11,400 | 5,200 |
Tonight’s Final Jeopardy! category is:
| LITERARY GEOGRAPHY |
How many monkey wrenches will we see with these numbers?
First-order calculations
Bill barely has over half of Annie’s score, so I suggest he go for broke.
| Annie |
Katrina |
Bill | |||
| 10,200 | 11,400 | 5,200 | |||
| FIRST-ORDER | SECOND-ORDER | COVER ZERO | |||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 200 | 7,800 | 9,000 | 4,800* | ||
| 2,800 | |||||
| 1,000 | |||||
Second-order calculations
There are some mind games, but I still think Katrina should go for the lockout.
| Annie |
Katrina |
Bill | |||
| 10,200 | 11,400 | 5,200 | |||
| FIRST-ORDER | SECOND-ORDER | COVER ZERO | |||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 200 | 5,400 | 9,000 | 4,800* | ||
| 2,200 | 6,600 | 400 | |||
| 1,000 | 2,800 | ||||
Zero wagers
Score differences:
Katrina and Annie: 1,200
Katrina and Bill: 6,200
Annie and Bill: 5,000
| Annie |
Katrina |
Bill | |||
| 10,200 | 11,400 | 5,200 | |||
| FIRST-ORDER | SECOND-ORDER | COVER ZERO | |||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 2,400 | 5,000 | 9,000 | 12,400 | 5,000* | |
| 200 | 2,200 | 6,600 | 400 | ||
| 1,000 | 2,800 | ||||
Then we add a dollar to the minimum wagers, and subtract a dollar from the maximum wagers.
What actually happened
| Annie | Katrina | Bill | |||
| 10,200 | 11,400 | 5,200 | |||
| 10,000 | 4,000 | 5,200 | |||
| 200 | 7,400 | 0 | |||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 2,401 | 4,999 | 9,001 | 12,399 | 5,200 | |
| 201 | 2,199 | 6,601 | 399 | ||
| 999 | 2,799 | ||||
Yikes. I guess someone found that other wagering site.
The Final Jeopardy! clue
| LITERARY GEOGRAPHY |
| SHELLEY SUBTITLED A POEM NAMED FOR THIS FAMOUS GEOGRAPHIC FEATURE “LINES WRITTEN IN THE VALE OF CHAMOUNI” |

Bill incorrectly answered the $1,600 algorithm question as “greatest common denominator” instead of “greatest common divisor”. I was very surprised that the judges didn’t catch this and correct the score before Final Jeopardy”. There is no such thing as a greatest common denominator.
I agree, Larry. There’s “least common denominator,” which is the least common multiple of the denominators of two or more fractions, but there is no such thing as a “greatest common denominator,” as a common denominator could be as large as you want it to be. The correct answer was definitely “greatest common divisor” and I’m shocked that none of the judges caught this. I wonder if the answer was just written incorrectly.