Final Jeopardy! wagering analysis:
Monday, March 14, 2016
[php snippet=55]
In tonight’s video, I thank a lot of people. And then do other things.
I hope the video speaks for itself. Thank you to everyone who was supportive after last week’s meltdown. It was just one of those weeks.
Here are tonight’s scores:
|
Gordon Moffat (1x) |
Philip Tiu |
Amanda Darby |
| 16,000 | 10,600 | 11,000 |
And we’ve got this category:
| THE NOBEL PHYSICS PRIZE |
Philip is a math professor, so this should be fun. I am unsure whether either player was a holdover from last time – if neither was, then neither is aware of Gordon’s wager from Friday.
First-order calculations
Amanda is in Stratton’s Dilemma: she should either wager everything or very little.
| Gordon |
Philip |
Amanda | |||
| 16,000 | 10,600 | 11,000 | |||
| FIRST-ORDER | SECOND-ORDER | COVER ZERO | |||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 6,000 | 600 | 10,200* | |||
| 1,000 | |||||
Second-order calculations
There is some potential for mind games.
| Gordon |
Philip |
Amanda | |||
| 16,000 | 10,600 | 11,000 | |||
| FIRST-ORDER | SECOND-ORDER | COVER ZERO | |||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 6,000 | 200 | 600 | 10,200* | ||
| 9,400* | 200 | 1,000 | |||
| 4,000 | |||||
Zero wagers
Score differences:
Gordon and Amanda: 5,000
Gordon and Philip: 5,400
Amanda and Philip: 400
| Gordon |
Philip |
Amanda | |||
| 16,000 | 10,600 | 11,000 | |||
| FIRST-ORDER | SECOND-ORDER | COVER ZERO | |||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 6,000 | 400 | 600 | 10,200* | ||
| 9,400* | 200 | 400 | |||
| 4,000 | |||||
Well, let’s see what happens here.
What actually happened
| Gordon | Philip | Amanda | |||
| 16,000 | 10,600 | 11,000 | |||
| 4,000 | 10,598 | 5,000 | |||
| 12,000 | 21,198 | 6,000 | |||
| min | max | min | max | min | max |
| 6,001 | 401 | 599 | 11,000 | ||
| 10,600 | 201 | 399 | |||
| 3,999 | |||||
Seems like we have a plague of people wagering 4,000 and 5,000. What is going on? We were doing so well for a few weeks.
In any event: We’re back in business here, and I have a smile on my face tonight.
The Final Jeopardy! clue
| THE NOBEL PHYSICS PRIZE |
| A 2013 LAUREATE, THIS BRITISH MAN WROTE A 1954 THESIS ON “PROBLEMS IN THE THEORY OF MOLECULAR VIBRATIONS” |
[spoiler]Who is Peter Higgs? (The existence of the “God particle”, a.k.a. the Higgs boson, was confirmed in 2012.)[/spoiler]
![]()
[php snippet=55]

Keith, I’m so glad you haven’t left us! And great video for your “return”! BTW, while Philip did bet big on his DD, was there any justification for him not to go all-in, with time running out and his actual wager leaving him on the wrong end of a crush rather than a 2/3 situation (especially if he didn’t know that Gordon was likely to not bet to cover)? If he got his $4,000 DD wrong, he would have been out of contention in the game anyway.
Yay! Keith’s back and better than ever!
Glad you reconsidered!
Final Jeopardy
“This slapstick buddy comedy centers on a skinny, temperamental chihuahua and his trusting feline sidekick.”
Happy, happy, joy, joy.
So over happy and overjoyed that you are going to continue.
And I loved the time this hit my email inbox. Early is great on the Left Coast.
Wow! Did Philip have problems with the buzzer or what?
One more time: Happy, happy, joy, joy.
Philip was a holdover from the previous day. I’ll be his opponent tonight!