Friday, February 20, 2015
| previous week | same week | following week | ||||||||||||
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
Thanks to several warnings about tonight’s wagers, I was able to record my reaction in real time.![]()
Christina trailed big in her first two victories. How will she respond from the lead?
|
Christina McTighe |
Dava-Leigh Brush |
Ashley Singh |
| 13,900 | 11,000 | 7,400 |
OK, just watch the video. The category:
| WORD ORIGINS |
First-order calculations
Second doubles up
| Christina | Dava-Leigh | Ashley |
| 13,900 | 11,000 | 7,400 |
| 8,100 | 11,000 | |
| 22,000 | 22,000 |
If Christina misses…
| Christina | Dava-Leigh | Ashley |
| 13,900 | 11,000 | 7,400 |
| 8,100 | 5,200 | 1,600 |
| 5,800 | 5,800 | 5,800 |
Third doubles up
| Christina | Dava-Leigh | Ashley |
| 13,900 | 11,000 | 7,400 |
| 900 | 3,800 | 7,400 |
| 14,800 | 14,800 | 14,800 |
If Dava-Leigh misses…
| Christina | Dava-Leigh | Ashley |
| 13,900 | 11,000 | 7,400 |
| 3,800 | 200 | |
| 7,200 | 7,200 |
Putting everything together…

Second-order calculations
Second’s max vs. first
| Christina | Dava-Leigh | Ashley |
| 13,900 | 11,000 | 7,400 |
| 2,300 | 5,200 | |
| 16,200 | 16,200 |
And if Christina misses…
| Christina | Dava-Leigh | Ashley |
| 13,900 | 11,000 | 7,400 |
| 2,300 | 600 | |
| 11,600 | 11,600 |
Third’s max vs. second
| Christina | Dava-Leigh | Ashley |
| 13,900 | 11,000 | 7,400 |
| 3,400 | 200 | |
| 7,600 | 7,600 |
If Ashley’s scared that Dava-Leigh will go small, she could go big – everything.
Now let’s tack on…
Zero wagers

What actually happened

I don’t understand.
While technically this wasn’t a Cliff Clavin, the color scheme is much more deserved than Julia’s miscalculation or Jennifer’s oops-I-would-have-gotten-a-wild-card-anyway.
Uh… see you Monday.
The Final Jeopardy! clue
| WORD ORIGINS |
| DESCRIBING ANYTHING VERY SHOWY, IN ARCHITECTURE IT REFERS TO A STYLE USING CURVES LIKE TONGUES OF FIRE |
[spoiler]What is flamboyant?[/spoiler]
| previous week | same week | following week | ||||||||||||
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |

Looking at a couple of Christina’s tweets after last night, it seems she might have been just happy to be there in game 3, if not all of her games. She clearly lost sight of the Herm Edwards Rule… “Hello? YOU PLAY TO WIN THE GAME!!”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b5-iJUuPWis
Based on this season so far, we might also refer to this principle as the “Christine Kim rule” or the “Lydia Cuffman rule.”