2014 TOC preview: Quarterfinal #5
#ToC2014 dashboard | |||||||||
QF1 | preview | QF2 | preview | QF3 | preview | QF4 | preview | QF5 | preview |
analysis | analysis | analysis | analysis | analysis | |||||
SF1 | preview | SF2 | preview | SF3 | preview | F1 | preview | F2 | preview |
analysis | analysis | analysis | analysis | analysis |
Our fifth and final match-up pits two 6-time champs in Jared Hall and Sandie Baker against the lone 4-timer, Mark Japinga, who dethroned Ben Ingram in regular play. This trio had to sit in the green room all day, waiting for their chance to get some fresh air – and a crack at the signaling devices.
Let’s take a look at their wagering histories.
Jared Hall
6 wins, $181,001
Jared was my first-ever victim subject on The Final Wager; he entered Season 30 as a two-time champ, and won the first four games of the week before succumbing to exhaustion (most likely) on the Friday game.
Jared had locks in Games 1, 4 ($42,000), and 5.
(Complete list on The Final Wager and J! Archive)
Game 2 (July 26, 2013)
Jared | Bruce | Leigh |
18,400 | 4,800 | 19,200 |
10,000 | 4,799 | 800 |
28,400 | 9,599 | 18,400 |
This is a risky wager, as it allows third back into the game. However, because this is the Strong Form of Shore’s Conjecture, it’s a great move if he thinks Leigh will go for the “Shoretegic” wager of 8,000. Bruce should really cap his wager at 3,200, which would bring him up to 8,000 if he’s right, giving Jared an advantage of 400 were he to miss.
Game 3 (September 16, 2013)
Jared | Angela | James |
18,800 | 14,400 | 6,400 |
10,001 | 10,000 | 6,400 |
28,801 | 24,400 | 12,800 |
Simple lockout move.
Game 6 (September 19, 2013)
Jared | Parth | Hillary |
10,000 | 13,600 | 4,800 |
10,000 | 6,401 | 2,400 |
20,000 | 7,199 | 7,200 |
This situation came before I had delved into mind games, so I gave Jared a bad mark here. Of course, he made the right move – Parth was a hard-sciences guy and the Final category was about pop music. Because Jared didn’t have 3/4 of Parth’s score, he couldn’t cover a seemingly likely zero wager, so he went all in.
Game 7 (September 20, 2013)
Jared | Kellie | Matt |
2,200 | 4,400 | 20,200 |
2,200 | 0 | 4,800 |
0 | 4,400 | 15,400 |
Jared and Kellie both made the right plays here.
Sandie Baker
6 wins, $140,200
Sandie’s original games were a lot of fun to watch, because she ran ragged over the competition while clearly enjoying the experience. And, counter to most players, she actually got stronger as she continued to play; she had locks in Games 4, 5, and 6, and a solid score in the lead in Game 7.
(Complete list on The Final Wager and J! Archive)
Game 1 (April 9, 2014)
Derrick | Sandie | Ed |
6,800 | 12,400 | 15,900 |
6,500 | 10,000 | 8,901 |
300 | 22,400 | 6,999 |
I gave this a pink grade – Sandie won’t win if she’s wrong. 3,500–5,400 was my preferred range.
Game 2 (April 10, 2014)
Sandie | Bruce | Jessica |
14,000 | 8,100 | 11,200 |
8,500 | 8,000 | 5,001 |
22,500 | 16,100 | 16,201 |
This is a wager-to-tie situation, since Jessica has exactly 4/5 of Sandie’s score. It’s weak, though, since Bruce forces Jessica to cover him.
Game 3 (April 11, 2014)
Sandie | Rebecca | Monique |
13,400 | 11,800 | 6,700 |
10,300 | 11,800 | 6,700 |
23,700 | 23,600 | 0 |
Sandie, apparently, was another “go for the win +100” advocate. Julia Collins was in the audience for Sandie’s last three games, waiting to be called on; perhaps Sandie was her muse.
This situation, by the way, was another what I call “off-menu” wager-to-tie situation: A = 2*C and A-B > B-C. Don’t worry about it.
Game 7 (April 17, 2014)
Sandie | Frédérique | Kristin |
15,400 | 6,200 | 13,200 |
11,100 | 0 | 13,199 |
4,300 | 6,200 | 1 |
Frédérique uses some cagey wagering (and an overbet by Kristin) to begin a two-win run – one that almost claimed challenger Julia Collins as a victim.
Mark Japinga
4 wins, $112,600
Mark Japinga (pronounced JAP-ing-uh; everyone screws it up, including Alex) is one of the most fearsome competitors in this year’s TOC. Not only did he unseat eight-timer Ben Ingram in his first game, he averaged over $28,000 in his four wins.
(Complete list on J! Archive)
Game 1 (July 11, 2013)
Ben | Dawn | Mark |
14,400 | 21,000 | 15,600 |
3,600 | 0 | 15,599 |
18,000 | 21,000 | 31,199 |
Stratton’s Dilemma; Mark appropriately goes for everything.
Game 2 (July 12, 2013)
Mark | Toby | Ken |
20,800 | 26,400 | 6,600 |
7,500 | 15,400 | 6,000 |
28,300 | 11,000 | 600 |
Shore’s Conjecture, Intermediate Form – and Mark throws out a perfect wager.
Game 3 (July 15, 2013)
Mark | Bradley | Deborah |
16,700 | 5,600 | 8,600 |
501 | 5,599 | 8,101 |
17,201 | 11,199 | 16,701 |
Looking for the win +$1.
Game 4 (July 16, 2013)
Mark | Jeffrey | Amanda |
20,900 | 17,600 | 3,600 |
15,000 | 14,000 | 3,600 |
35,900 | 31,600 | 7,200 |
Another high-scoring game, and another big wager.
Game 5 (July 17, 2013)
Mark | Kerri | John |
10,400 | 15,600 | 7,200 |
10,400 | 5,000 | 3,201 |
0 | 10,600 | 3,999 |
Mark has exactly 2/3 of Kerri’s score; why Kerri didn’t add just 200 more to her wager is beyond me.
My prediction: Jared wins this one by a RAZOR-THIN margin to Mark, while Sandie is behind Mark a few hundreds, perhaps. The two advance as wildcards, and promptly lose. Semis: Ben, Arthur, Julia win all three, and the highly-anticipated final arrives.
I don’t know that yet, but we’ll see
Well, your prediction is right for the QF but just switch Mark and Sandie.You are right about the semis too. GEEZ!!!!
I’ve never screwed up Mark’s last name JAP-ing-uh-JAPINGA.