Skip to content
September 26, 2014

Daily analysis, Friday, September 26

previous week same week following week
1516171819 2223242526 2930123

Today, I’m trying to do my analysis during the commercial break before Final.The Final Wager – September 26, 2014

I bet Catherine wishes she had read Watchmen, which is named for another translation of that Juvenal quote. That would have put her in the lead heading into Final… alas.

Catherine Hardee: 18,200
Tod Macofsky: 6,600
Alan Lange: 18,900

The Final Jeopardy! category: FAMOUS AMERICANS

This is another example of the Strong Form of Shore’s Conjecture, with mind games galore.

Basic strategy – first vs. second

Alan should wager 17,500 to cover Catherine.

Catherine can wager up to 16,800 to stay above Alan if they’re both wrong.

Tod can wager up to 5,200 to stay above Alan should they both miss.

Basic strategy – second vs. third

Catherine can guarantee she won’t lose to Tod by capping her wager at 5,000.

Basic strategy – Rule #3

Catherine should wager 700 to cover a zero by Alan, and 1,400 to cover an “unsafe” wager.

Because Catherine can simultaneously cover Alan’s score and stay ahead of Tod, we have Shore’s Conjecture.

Mind games – first vs. second

Let’s say Catherine goes for that 5,000 wager. Alan would best respond by wagering 4,300.

If he’s wrong, he’ll have 14,600, which means Catherine should cap her wager at 3,600.

Mind games – second vs. third

If Tod gets it right with his 5,200 wager, he’ll have 11,800 – so perhaps Catherine could wager up to 6,400 if she’s afraid of that smaller wager out of Alan.

What actually happened

I have plans to go to a few tapings this coming week in Culver City. Perhaps I should reconsider my plans lest I be held hostage for the $35,400 this cost Sony Pictures Studios.

Why bring back a 4-time champion? some people say. Well, consider what would have happened had this turned out to be a triple stumper:

Now, I must admit there’s less of a reason to offer a tie in this particular situation. If Catherine thinks you’re going for the tie, you’ve done your job; there’s no harm in adding the extra dollar against Catherine (unless you’re afraid of the 5,200 wager out of Tod, which it appears he was trying to do, but messed up the math).

The tie wager relies in large part on whether subsequent players know you’ll offer it. This was the last game in a taping session; at most two potential opponents – the alternate(s) for that day – will have seen that you’ve offered the tie in the past.

I explain the psychology behind this in my video on Arthur Chu’s tie game in January.

The Final Jeopardy! clue

FAMOUS AMERICANS

IN 1936 AT AGE 79, HE PUBLISHED AN ARTICLE IN ESQUIRE MAGAZINE IN WHICH HE DESCRIBED HOW TO PICK A JURY

Correct response: Show

 

previous week same week following week
1516171819 2223242526 2930123
2 Comments
  1. Standing up there just trying not to screw it up. Lots of adrenaline after DJ. I double and triple checked that I’d bet enough to cover Catherine doubling up. It never did occur to me to add the extra for the win.
    No alternates left. We had a no show and only ten (plus Matthew) in the green room. Tod and Dolly were the locals.

    Meh

  2. Blake permalink

    1 Green Wager this whole week. UGHHHH

What do you think?