Skip to content
October 24, 2013

Wagering practice – say Zyg-a-Zyg ahhhhh?

Thanks to The Battle of the Decades Fan Voting, many of us became familiar with the awesomely-named Melizza Zygmunt, who won four games in 1998.

Her win total – if not her paycheck – got a bit of a boost in her fourth game, thanks to some daring wagers by her opponents. What should each of them have done?

Final Jeopardy! wagering practice 20131024 Slide01

Have a look through the answers here.

(Thanks to the J! Archive)


Answers to Wednesday’s scenario:

(click to view as a slideshow)

Return to top

2 Comments
  1. Josh Woo permalink

    Many thanks, Keith!

    For years I’ve been telling folks that Matt had been mathematically out of contention by the time Final came around. Now I know that wasn’t the case at all–especially since Becca and I were a little too close for comfort!

    • You’re welcome, Josh!

      With proper wagering by Becca, Matt SHOULD have been out of contention – but her large bet could have let him back in.

What do you think?